We like WidgetBucks! Why this up-and-coming ad network deserves a close look.

We’re always on the lookout for new ways to monetize a website. We’ve covered multiple ad-networks in the past, but Widgetbucks is an up-and-comer that really deserves a close look. Why?

Well, for starters Widgetbucks ad-units yield 50% to 300% more on average than most traditional ad networks. But that’s not all we liked. Read on for our in-depth review of this promising advertising network.…

WidgetBucks Review: What is WidgetBucks?

Their model is similar to Chitika’s eMiniMalls (covered in our recent Alternatives to AdSense article) with context sensitive ads that feature consumer products in embedded interactive ads. But the WidgetBucks platform stands on its own in a number of interesting ways.



These ‘pay-per-click Shopping widgets’ display popular consumer products (think DV cameras, cool footwear, DVD’s and more) using a unique algorithm which uses data gathered from millions of shoppers and selectively displays products based on your site content. We like this hybrid of a contextual ad and a micro-site. And the fact that the products are displayed with an eye on contextual relevance looks like a solid way to increase click through. (Although we’re not 100% sure how WidgetBucks matches products to site content on a site that doesn’t discuss any consumer products. If anyone tries that, we’d appreciate some details). WidgetBucks widgets also display both CPM and CPC ads, depending on what’s best for the site they’re appearing on..

The Setup

Setup was a snap. One of the things we like about WidgetBucks ad units is the vast selection of configurations to choose from: There are over 300 to pick through, and 256 color schemes to boot. Ads are embedded the usual way, with a small snippet of javascript code embedded in your site. In the account creation phase WidgetBucks offers two methods of payment: check and PayPal. Payments are made at a standard $50 minimum.

First Impressions

One slightly unexpected thing about WidgetBucks ads was the dynamic nature of the ads. The ads continuously cycle through a selection of products The ads are also interactive, allowing your site visitors to explore the ads, which are actually fully fledged sites squeezed into a very small amount of space. The one we embedded included multiple vendors, product ratings, top 10 lists and buying trends. Pretty cool considering it was all squeezed into a tiny space.

But I already use AdSense…

No WidgetBucks review would be complete without mentioning it’s ‘compatibility’ with AdSense: The ads aren’t contextual in the same way that AdSense ads are, and they look nothing like AdSense ads — so using WidgetBucks alongside (or on the same page as) AdSense ads isn’t a problem at all. (WidgetBucks ads are used frequently on the same page as AdSense ads - Ed)

A couple things to keep in mind

Now before jumping on the WidgetBucks bandwagon (and we suggest at least giving WidgetBucks a try, as the network looks like it’s got great potential, and setup was so quick) there are a couple of things we have to mention to make this WidgetBucks review complete:

1) It’s not ok to place widgets on non-English sites.

2) It’s also against the rules to place the widgets on a page just containing a bunch of ads (who would want to look at that page anyway?)

3) Adult content is no-bueno.

4) You must provide a valid domain name for the widgets you create.

5) Click fraud of any kind will get you booted (Duh.)

A possible problem?

Well, you knew there had to be something. (We don’t want to sound like cheerleaders after all). One problematic issue that we see is #4 above. We’re not 100% sure on this yet, and we’ve sent a question to their people to get some clarity on what it actually means. It looks to us like each widget needs its own static URL — which might create problems for dynamically generated pages — and it would certainly be a nightmare for webmasters with larger, established sites containing hundreds or thousands of pages.

Verdict

We like WidgetBucks! It’s certainly a sophisticated network, and the ease of setup combined with the promise of higher advertising earnings (plus the fact that it makes a “good neighbor” to AdSense ads) makes it a no brainer for us. Usually we’re forced to ask the question: Is it better than AdSense? But in this case it doesn’t matter. Using them both isn’t a problem. WidgetBucks has got fantastic promise for anyone blogging on electronic and/or consumer products — where the context sensitive nature of the widgets should make for well-blended ad units

A look at some AdSense alternatives. (Could you be making more money?)

AdSense often represents a small part (or no part) of the total revenues earned by a website. In a previous article we published an exhaustive list of the dozens of alternatives to Google’s ubiquitous AdSense advertising network. In this article we’ll get up-close and personal with a couple of these alternative networks. We’ll tell you what the differences are, and we’ll discuss why you may (or may not) see an increase in revenues with some alternative advertising strategies.

Could you be making more money?


The answer depends largely on your site. In order to correctly project revenues for any particular blog or website we would first need the answers to questions like: What is your blog about? What is your target market? Do you sell merchandise? Does your blog discuss any kind of consumer products? Etc.

For that reason, the question of whether or not any one of the following advertising networks is right for you, isn’t a question that can be answered in a general sense. The only real test is to give a new network a try, and see what happens to your earnings. Remember that many affiliate networks can take time to yield revenues — so “giving a new network a try” should involve at very least a one month trial.

Without further delay — let’s take a look at some alternatives to AdSense:

1) Clicksor

Clicksor is giving Google AdSense some serious competition these days, especially among smaller website publishers. The most attractive thing about Clicksor is that they pay out a whopping 85% of revenues.
That means if an advertiser is paying $1 per click, Clicksor is passing a whopping .85 to the site owner. The primary Clicksor advertising model is “in line” contextual advertising links. A clicksor text link ad looks just like a regular link on a page. If you move your mouse over that link, you’ll see a temporary DHTML popup floating over the link.












Clicksor also offers multiple other advertising styles including “Text Banner Ads”, “Rich Media / Flash banners”, “Pop Unders” and more. It should also be noted that Clicksor’s rich-media banners pay an average CPM of .50, which is significantly higher than the average AdSense ad unit. Webrevenue.org tested Clicksor on some other websites and we were duly impressed. The relevance of the advertising seemed to be equal to or higher than Google’s ad relevance. And the revenue generated in our particular case, seemed to be a clear improvement. Clicksor also offered two methods of payment: Check or Paypal.

One mild negative to the Clicksor network, is that their reporting and management tools are not as good as Google’s. Google also has better control over the look and feel of the text link ads — which allow AdSense ads to blend nicely with existing page content.

2) Yahoo! Publisher Network

Yahoo!’s Publisher Network is first rate alternative to Google AdSense. The network is extremely similar to Google’s and offers nearly identical ad formats and styles. It is believed that the payout percentage offered by Yahoo! is also equal to Google’s.

Yahoo!’s administrative tools appear to be a notch up from Google’s in terms of graphical quality, and sophistication — making site analysis easier and potentially more profitable.

One extremely nice feature of the Yahoo! Publisher Network is the ability to insert ads into RSS feeds, allowing web publishers to profit from sites who re-publish content through RSS.

Like Clicksor, Yahoo! Publisher Network also allows for compensation via PayPal.






3) AdBrite

Adbrite is a large advertising network (over 500 million impressions across over 50,000 sites) which includes in its network such well known sites as Alexa, LinkedIn, Excite and iWon. Also in their network are a-list blogs including The Drudge Report and BoingBoing. Adbrite supports standard ad unit types including text ads, inline link ads, banners and more. AdBrite also features full page interstitial units, video units and special interactive image units called “BritePics”.

AdBrite features an excellent level of ad customization allowing for seamless visual integration with all site designs. AdBrite even allows publishers to review ads before they appear on the site, and if AdBrite can’t meet a publisher’s minimum revenue requirement, publishers have the option to default to an alternate ad network like Google AdSense.

Google Reduces AdSense Referral Payout: What’s going on behind the scenes?

Website publishers who use Google’s AdSense advertising network received an email this week with some unpopular news: The kickback for referring other publishers to the AdSense platform is being drastically reduced.

Is this email an indication of Google maturing into a less-friendly, more profit-centric company? Or is something else going on?

The current pay structure of Google’s own referral program works like this:

• Referrers earn $5 when the referred publisher generates $5 in AdSense earnings.
• Referrers earn a nice $250 kickback when the referred publisher generates $100 through AdSense
• Referrers earn a fat $2000 kickback when a total of 25 publishers have been referred (provided they themselves also generate $100 through AdSense).

Disregarding the last bullet point above — which is more difficult to reach — the total kickback for referring a publisher (who in-turn earned $100) used to be $255.

<script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-5159071627280300";
google_ad_host = "pub-1599271086004685";
/* 300x250, created 4/16/09 */
google_ad_slot = "2904446486";
google_ad_width = 300;
google_ad_height = 250;
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script>

The New Payment Structure

Under Google’s new terms, the 3-tiered structure above is being abandoned in favor of a single-tier system: Publishers will now receive $100 when the referred publisher generates $100. No further goals will be rewarded after this point. In other words: AdSense publishers just saw their revenue get whacked by over 60% for Google AdSense referrals.

Why Did Google Reduce it’s AdSense Referral Payouts?

There are a number of reasons why this reduction in fees may have happened: For starters, Google may have been on the losing end of the equation. They were paying out $255 after only $100 had been generated. In other words Google was advancing the referrer $155 on the bet that the referred site would continue to generate revenue at a similar rate once it had already hit $100 in revenues. The practice seemed to make sense. After all — if a site has already generated $100 worth of clicks it was likely to carry-on generating revenue — eventually paying for the entire $255 originally shelled-out to the referrer. Right? Well, perhaps not. We don’t have the privilege of looking at Google’s books, but one reason Google may have backed out of its referral/compensation structure is that betting on the future returns of sites after earning their first $100 may not have been as cut-and-dry as it looked on paper.

Other Possibilities…

Website publishers using AdSense for the past few years have seen their AdSense content-advertising revenue slowly decrease. While there have been many rumours about Google slowly reducing its percentage/payout structure — Google has denied these theories. So why the reduction in payouts? There are a few other possibilities, and while we don’t want to read too deeply into Google’s policy-change, it isn’t every day we get a new datapoint that might give us some insight into the mysterious inner workings of Google. (And please excuse our shameless jumps to conclusions … we are fully aware that what follows is conjecture)

We know that payouts for publishers have been decreasing, and we know that Google claims it has not changed its formula for compensating publishers by a proportional measure. Could this mean that advertising spending as a whole is dropping? Or that there are simply too many small publishers competing over too few advertising dollars. (Let’s hope it’s not the latter — although the ease of launching a ‘made for AdSense’ website certainly suggests that the number of ‘content’ sites may be growing far more quickly than available advertising dollars).

Another possibility is that Google is trying to put the brakes on incentivizing new AdSense enrollees because of the proliferation of low-quality sites. By so strongly incentivizing new AdSense members — Google may have been contributing to its own well-known problem of blogspam and junk sites.

Does it matter?

It probably doesn’t make much of a difference to most bloggers and site publishers because Google referrals are usually not a primary profit center. While there are some blogs whose entire focus is essentially “Join AdSense Now for Big Bucks”, those sites are a small minority of AdSense publishers. WebRevenue.org doesn’t even utilize AdSense referrals (at the time of this writing, at least) so we won’t notice much of a change on our end.

If anyone out there will be impacted by this change, drop us a line and share some details.

How to earn more than $10,000 per month from your blog

My friend Michael makes an average of $370 per day on his blog. That’s an annualized income of $133,200 from blogging. I’ll leave out his last name so that I don’t violate his Adsense ‘Terms of Service’. ( For those who don’t know, it is against Google policy to directly discuss one’s Adsense earnings for a particular site ). The other day I sat down for lunch with Michael and asked him for his story: In a little more than 18 months, he went from earning less than $1/day to quitting his day job, and building a successful site.

His advice was priceless…


First, a little background

Before I get into specifics, let me say that Michael is no kind of technical guru, nor is he a Nobel prize winning author (although he writes very well). He’s a blogger, in every sense of the word: self-taught, smart and hard working. This is a story about hard work, consistent effort, a little luck, and a lot of smarts. His blog started as a basic Wordpress blog and a free template.


After about one year, he hired a designer/coder to make some custom modifications. (He’s still ‘unsure’ exactly how much of a difference his custom modifications have made in his traffic and revenue growth, but both have risen dramatically over the same time period).

(This was quite a long interview, so some of Michael’s answers have been paraphrased in order to make this a quicker read).

Rule #1 - Persistence, and keeping the blog fresh


Michael gets almost a little zen-like when he talks about “Rule #1″, but to him it is the most important rule of all: Decide that you want to create a successful site, and agree with yourself to make it happen.

Michael: “Most blogs fail because bloggers fail to blog. The single most important thing is building a base of readers. There is simply no way that can happen if you’re a “once every two-weeks” blogger. You have to decide to blog, and keep blogging. It has to be a mandatory part of your routine — like walking your dog. You must blog. You must post. Even if you’re posting a paragraph at a time: You must post.”

Michael admits that he will frequently write three or four posts on a Sunday, and use “timestamping” to release those posts over the course of the next few days. This practice keeps a blog fresh over time, even if inspiration strikes ‘all at once’. He also says he doesn’t feel like he works quite “full time”, but there are certainly nights when he “works until the wee hours”.

Rule #2 - Don’t get discouraged, but be willing to tweak your concept

Michael’s revenue started about less than $1 per day — and after six months was only a few dollars per day. Some articles seemed to get many more visitors than others.

Michael: “There’s a difference between persistence, and being bull-headed. I noticed that one particular subject really brought in the visits — so I made the business decision to focus 90% of my time on similar articles. That was a pretty huge moment for the site…. From that day on — which was about six months in — my traffic went up pretty steadily every month. … The thing is, I never would have discovered the niche that I’m in now if I hadn’t blogged every day for six months making basically no money. So in a sense, you have to go through that really awful part to get to the phase where you actually feel like you’re growing. I don’t know if that’s a hard and fast rule for everyone, but for me there was a lot of trial and error.”

Rule #3 - How commercial are you going to be? Decide before you start

Michael’s blog relates to a very specific industry. It is designed at every level to cater to a particular type of advertising. Michael is the first to admit that he’d rather be writing random posts about his favorite films, his vacation, his kids, and his favorite football team.

Michael: “People think that writing a commercial blog means taking your personal blog and sticking a bunch of Adsense ads on it. I’d be amazed if you could make $1 per day doing that. Very few people want to read it, and I can’t imagine many advertisers wanting a piece of it. For [blog name] I decided in advance that this was a commercial writing project, and that I was going to pursue a very specific market which was rich in advertising dollars. I knew in advance that I was going to put plenty of ads on the page, and I accepted that this would make for somewhat cluttered pages….This wasn’t going to be an entry for a web design contest — it was a business. I wanted to make money online — I wanted to blog for a living”

Michael says he typed in hundreds of keywords into an Adwords account to see where the maximum advertising dollars could be yielded. At every level — the site was planned as a commercial venture.

Rule #4 - Read every day

There are an enormous number of web technologies to keep up with. Michael estimates that he reads the web for at least an hour (and often much more) per day. He surfs competing websites and he reads informational sites full of content relating to the business of blogging (yes, webrevenue.org!) and new technologies, advertising platforms, affiliate offers, etc.

Michael: “You can’t live in a vacuum. I’ve gone through about 30 different affiliate deals — most of which didn’t work out. I’ve added and removed dozens of plugins. I’ve changed servers twice. And at the end of all that I’ve got a winning formula. But it takes time to study, learn, discuss on bulletin boards and just keep up with what’s going on. I also read the blogs of my two main competitors every day. To be a blogger you can’t just be a writer, you have to be a pretty avid reader too. And you have to be willing to change your platforms, your topics and your technologies at any moment.”

Rule #5 - Understand SEO — but don’t waste too much time on it

Search engine optimization strategies can be incredibly complicated, and an enormous amount of work to implement. What works one month may not work next month because the big search engines are constantly tweaking their algorithms. Writing is probably a more effective way to spend one’s time. “Content is king”, says Michael:

Michael: “When I first started I spent hours tweaking my site for maximum search engine optimization. I counted keywords and I checked things like “keyword density”. Finally it occured to me that in the same amount of time I spent doing all that stuff, I could have just written a whole new post — or even a couple of new posts. And since I wasn’t even sure which topics were the most successful topics when I was starting out — I eventually realized that wasting time on SEO was silly compared to writing, exploring and trying different types of post. Worry about building your site and writing your content first”

[That having been said — Michael’s site looks very well optimized to me… -ed]

Rule #6 - Use Social News Sites

Michael has had his site featured on the front page of Slashdot.org three times last year. Digg.com has also been very good to him. ( See our incredibly popular webrevenue.org article “How to get on Digg’s Front Page - Secrets of the Power Diggers” ). Michael spends at least one half-hour per day promoting his site elsewhere on the Internet.

Michael: “Digg is awesome. Slashdot is awesome. Del.icio.us is awesome too.
There’s no guarantee that they’re going to work out for you, and I still have
just as much, or as little chance as I had on day one. But the effect of getting
on Slashdot’s front page that first time was incredible. First my server crashed
— but fortunately my hosting company was pretty fantastic and we worked out some
additional bandwidth very quickly. I was also lucky to catch the problem early,
so that the traffic wasn’t wasted. My earnings for that day were my highest ever
at that point. That was really my first taste of what was possible in terms of
making money online. I think I wrote another ten posts the next day I was so
fired up. After going for months making basically nothing per day — it was a
pretty huge moment. It wasn’t a ton of money or anything, really — but it showed
that what I was doing could work. And the effect lasted for months. My traffic
was permanently higher afterwards.”

Rule #7 - Don’t count on AdSense alone

Michael uses a combination of the following revenue generators:

• Google Adsense
• Chitika eMiniMalls
• Commission Junction affiliate marketing deals
• LinkShare affiliate marketing deals
• Amazon store sales
• The (very rare) Pay-per-Post if its something ‘he would have blogged anyway’.

Michael: “Adsense is hit or miss. Actually everything’s hit or miss and that’s
why you need a lot of revenue streams — or ‘potential’ revenue streams I should
say. I’ll have days where my AdSense earnings are fantastic, and then I’ll have
days where I wonder why none of my thousands of visitors decided to click any
ads. I still don’t claim to have any real understanding of what makes a ‘good
day’ or a ‘bad day’. But I do know that with a broad combination of potential
revenue streams, I rarely have a real ‘down day’. You have to use all your
options. Although at first — when your site doesn’t have much content or
visitors, AdSense is fine. Lots of affiliates won’t even want to do business
with you until your site comes together.”


Rule #8 - Pay attention to your stats

Using a statistics package like AWstats, Google Analytics or Quantcast.com can really tell you an enormous amount about your site and your visitors. By using this information you can maximize those things that are working for you, and spend less time on things that aren’t working for you anyway. ( By the way, if you’re using AWstats as your statistics package, make sure you read our webrevenue.org article which compares AWstats to Google Analytics.)

Michael: “I’m a little embarrassed to say, but when I first started blogging I
did lots of stupid stuff like spamming bulletin boards and comments-sections
hoping to get traffic. I actually used to spend hours doing it. Then one day I
took a look at my “traffic sources” in Google Analytics and realized that all
that work amounted to 1 or 2 visits over the course of the week. Again, I could
have just written a whole other post in that amount of time. The bottom line is
that those cheesy ways of getting traffic, don’t actually build your site. Some
things do work, like learning how to effectively build support on Digg — but
posting in every little corner of the web pretty much does nothing. The point
is, I would probably never have reached that understanding without looking at my
stats. I’ve also learned which posts are the most popular. And which ones get
the most permanent external links. Once you understand that kind of thing, you
learn how to modify your blogging behavior to maximize traffic in the future.
Lots of times I’ll think something is working and the stats will basically tell
me, ‘no that thing you’re spending so much time on isn’t working at all’”

The AdSense Rockstars - Who are the Biggest AdSense Earners?

Every first-time web publisher wonders “How much will I make with AdSense”. While the somewhat discouraging answer may be, “Beer Money” (or less, depending on your taste for beer), it’s important to keep in mind that there are those who generate astronomical amounts of advertising revenue with their sites.

How much can you make with AdSense? The short answer is “the sky’s the limit” — as can be seen by looking at the revenues of the biggest AdSense earners.

Let’s take a look at some of the highest grossing individual publishers and webmasters…


Uber Rockstar: Markus Frind, PlentyOfFish.com

Markus Frind, founder of free dating site, PlentyOfFish.com makes between $10,000 and $15,000 per day from online advertising. From what we can tell, he’s no longer using AdSense though, so tecnically he’s just a “rockstar webmaster” and no longer an “adsense rockstar”. Does that matter? $10k per day is really all that matters. So on a bad month he’s pulling in $300k? By the way, if anyone reading this actually knows Markus, please tell him that his site looks like it got beat with the “ugly stick”. Surely, the man can afford a web designer now ?

Next up,

David Miles and Kato Leonard over at FreeWebLayouts.net

Two guys in their early twenties started this site for free web-page templates down in Louisville, KY. Good business model? Considering they’re pulling in over $100,000 per month, I’d have to say yes. How long did it take them to reach these stratospheric revenue numbers? A little more than one year.

Weblogs, Inc.

To be fair, Weblogs, Inc. isn’t a person. In fact, it’s hundreds of people all blogging together on a collection of over 100 different blogs. Started by Web 1.0 guru, Jason Calcanis (also father of the social search engine, Mahalo), Weblogs boasts somewhere north of 4,000 new blog entries per month (so figure the average Weblogs blogger is penning somewhere in the neighborhood of 10 entries per week). The flagship of Weblogs’ blogs is the well-known Engadget, technology site. As a consortium of blogs, Weblogs, Inc. receives close to 75 million pageviews per month and achieves revenues of over $100k per month.

Kevin Rose, Digg.com

If you haven’t heard of Digg.com, we invite you to come out from under that rock and enjoy a little sunlight for a change. Digg.com started in December, 2004 and cost a skimpy $1000 to start up. Not bad, considering Digg.com is now one of the most popular, and important sites for social news reading on the Internet today. That $1,000 start-up cost is even more impressive when one considers that Digg currently earns over $300,000 per month in advertising revenues. Only part of Digg’s revenue comes from AdSense however, the rest comes from selling banner ads through traditional media networks.

Lest you think that the lesson to be gleaned from the first three ‘rockstars’ is that focusing on a single niche doesn’t work — our next rockstar bogs about a single topic: home improvement.

Tim Carter of AskTheBuilder.com

AskTheBuilder is a pure-play “How To” site. If you’re looking to build a deck, replace an electrical fixture, strip the paint off some old furniture or install track-lighting — AskTheBuilder is the place to go. Tim Carter is a syndicated newspaper columnist who has parlayed his conventional-media exposure into a $1,400 per day AdSense earner.

Another niche-site that scores big with AdSense is one that does it in the travel-space:

Matther Daimler of SeatGuru.com

SeatGuru is based on a fact that we all know (far too well), but the airlines don’t want to admit: That all seats on a flight are not equal. Using seat guru, one can find if there’s a laptop power source nearby, or if one seat has more legroom than another, or if you’re in one of those seats that doesn’t recline (I’ve been there…). When SeatGuru first launched there was some question as to whether or not people “really cared” about such trivia. With 650,000 page views each month that question has been answered loud-and-clear. The site yields somewhere in the neighborhood of $15,000 to $20,000 per month, and is growing quickly.

I’ll cover more AdSense rockstars in a later post. And if you’re one of them — don’t hesitate to drop a line and give us the skinny on your fat profits.

Alternatives to AdSense - An Overview

Most independently owned websites start out using AdSense ads. Why? For starters, no one wants to sell their own ads. It’s time consuming and likely to be fruitless given the amount of traffic most new websites start out with.

AdSense is also one of the two big cpc ad-networks that everyone’s heard of (the other being Yahoo! Search), and Google is a reliable name that people trust. But after awhile you may feel like exploring the hundreds of other networks out there. …Or maybe not.…

Google provides excellent reporting tools, analytics services, multiple ad format options and the option of both revenue-per-click (RPC) and ‘referral’ revenue models. All in all, Google AdSense is a great place to start.

But there are many other options out there — some of which may generate higher revenues for publishers, depending on site content, traffic and a number of other factors. (This site uses AdSense by the way - ed).

How many other options are there? As of the date of this post, I know of over 200 competing ad networks (and there are probably more). Of course, not all of them are CPM based networks like Google. There are affiliate networks like Commission Junction, and Linkshare. There are contextual networks like AdBright and AdKnowledge. There are networks that cater to the grey areas of advertising, like PayPerPost and PointRoll. And there are networks that focus specifically on shopping and product comparison like Shopping.com and PriceGrabber.

This is by no means a complete, or a comprehensive list. I also haven’t included any of the many niche oriented and foreign language networks.

Traditional CPM Based Networks

* 24/7 RealMedia
* Accelerator
* AdAgency1
* AdConion
* AdDynamix / Pennyweb Networks
* AdOrigin
* AdPepper
* AdSmart
* Adtegrity
* Ampira Media
* Bannerconnect
* BannerSpace
* BlueLithium
* BURST! Media
* Casale Media
* Claxon Media
* Click Agents
* Copernic (Formerly MammaMedia)
* CPX Interactive
* Federated Media
* Gold Group
* Gorilla Nation Media
* IAC Advertising
* InterClick
* Interevco
* Joetec
* Oridian
* Premium Network
* Quake Marketing
* Quin Street
* RealCastMedia
* RealTechNetwork
* Revenue.net
* Right Media
* Rydium
* The Robert Sherman Company
* TMP
* Tribal Fusion
* Valuead.com
* ValueClick
* Yes Advertising
* HyperBidder


Affiliate Marketing Networks

* Advertising.com
* Amazon.com
* Axill
* Azoogle Ads
* ClickBank
* ClickBooth
* ClickXChange
* Commission Junction / BeFree
* CoverClicks
* DarkBlue
* DrivePM
* emarketmakers
* Linkshare
* Maxbounty
* Meta Reward
* ProfitCenter
* Revenue.Net
* ShareASale
* Strategic Affiliates
* WebSponsors

Contextual Advertising Networks

* Google AdSense
* Yahoo! Publisher Network
* AdForce
* AdHearUs
* AdKnowledge
* AdSonar
* Affiliate Sensor
* All Clicks
* AllFeeds

In some later posts I’ll be detailing specific features and experiences with specific networks, but in the meantime if anyone has any first hand experience with any of them — or some data for comparison — feel free to comment below and tell us what works and what doesn’t. I think it’s pretty safe to say that no one is going to try all of them, so it would be great to have some feedback from others.